Abstract—This research tries to explore the linguistic factors
affecting the citation rate of Chinese writer’s research articles.
We selected 50 SCI journal article introductions written by
English Native and Chinese writers respectively. We measured
their readability using Coh-Metrix. We then analyzed the data
based on Graesser & McNamara’s theory of multi-level
discourse comprehension. Our results show that the
introductions written by the two types of writers differ
significantly at the following levels: (1) at the discourse level, the
referential cohesion score of the Chinese writer’s introductions
was higher than that of the native speaker’s, indicating a higher
readability; (2) at the situation model level, the deep cohesion
and time sequential scores of the native writer’s introductions
were higher than those of the Chinese writer’s, suggesting higher
readability. Our findings also imply that although some
readability indices of Chinese writers’ introductions are higher
than those of the native writer’s, it does not necessarily indicate
high readability literally, nor good writing quality, which could
also be an explanation for the low citation rate. Moreover, the
results show that the readability parameters of Chinese and
native writer’s introductions differ at various levels, so it is hard
to conclude that the readability alone impacts the citation rate.
Index Terms—Coh-Metrix, introduction, journal article,
readability, citation rate
The authors are with the School of Foreign Studies, Northwestern
Polytechnical University, China.
*Correspondence: uibeyuhang@163.com (H.Y.)
[PDF]
Cite:Meiying Song, Qiwei Dai, and Hang Yu, "Comparative Analysis of the Readability of English Research Articles Written by Chinese and English Native Writers," International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 391-397, 2023.